Migrating to CEL Policies

This guide helps you migrate from ClusterPolicy to the new CEL-based policy types.

Deprecation Notice

ClusterPolicy, Policy, CleanupPolicy, and the legacy kyverno.io PolicyException are deprecated as of Kyverno v1.19 and will be removed in v1.20. The CEL-based policy types provide full feature parity as of v1.19. Plan your migration now — see the deprecation schedule.

Tip

Use kubectl explain cpol.spec for help on the ClusterPolicy schema.

• kubectl explain vpol.spec for ValidatingPolicy schema
• kubectl explain mpol.spec for MutatingPolicy schema
• kubectl explain gpol.spec for GeneratingPolicy schema
• kubectl explain dpol.spec for DeletingPolicy schema
• kubectl explain ivpol.spec for ImageValidaingPolicy schema

Key Differences

ClusterPolicy Structure

A ClusterPolicy contains an orderered list of rules and common settings.

apiVersion: kyverno.io/v1
kind: ClusterPolicy
metadata:
  name: require-labels
spec:
  validationFailureAction: Enforce
  rules:
    - name: check-labels
      match:
        any:
          - resources:
              kinds:
                - Pod
      validate:
        message: 'Required labels missing'
        pattern:
          metadata:
            labels:
              app: '?*'
              version: '?*'

CEL-based Policy Structure

Kyverno CEL-based policies are defined as discrete types where each policy is focused on a single action e.g., validate, mutate, generate, or cleanup. Each CEL-based policy can contain an ordered list of actions of the same type, e.g. spec.validations.

apiVersion: policies.kyverno.io/v1
kind: ValidatingPolicy
metadata:
  name: require-app-version-labels
spec:
  matchConstraints:
    resourceRules:
      - apiGroups:
          - ''
        apiVersions:
          - v1
        operations:
          - CREATE
          - UPDATE
        resources:
          - pods
  validationActions:
    - Deny
  validations:
    - expression: >
        ['app', 'version'].all(label,
          object.metadata.?labels[label].orValue('') != ''
        )
      message: 'Required labels missing'

Policy Settings

Here is a mapping of each ClusterPolicy field to the CEL-based equivalent:

Common Fields

ClusterPolicy	CEL-based policies
spec.admission	spec.evaluation.admission.enabled
applyRules	not applicable; convert each rule to a policy and use matchConditions.
spec.background	spec.evaluation.background.enabled
spec.emitWarning	spec.validationActions: Warn
spec.useServerSideApply	See: #14853
spec.webhookConfiguration.failurePolicy	spec.failurePolicy
spec.webhookConfiguration.matchConditions	spec.matchConditions
spec.webhookConfiguration.timeoutSeconds	spec.webhookConfiguration.timeoutSeconds

Rule Fields

ClusterPolicy	CEL-based policies
spec.rules.match	spec.matchExpressions and spec.matchConditions
spec.rules.exclude	spec.matchConstraints.excludeResourceRules
spec.rules.context	spec.variables
spec.rules.preconditions	spec.matchConditions
spec.rules.celPreconditions	spec.matchConditions
spec.rules.skipBackgroundRequests	See: #14852
spec.rules.reportProperties	spec.auditAnnotations
spec.rules.validate	ValidatingPolicy
spec.rules.mutate	MutatingPolicy
spec.rules.generate	GeneratingPolicy
spec.rules.imageExtactors	variables.expressions
spec.rules.verifyImages	ImageValidatingPolicy

Validate Rule

ClusterPolicy	CEL-based policies
spec.rules.validate.allowExistingViolations	not supported; use policy exceptions instead
spec.rules.validate.anyPattern	spec.validations
spec.rules.validate.assert	spec.validations
spec.rules.validate.cel	spec.validations
spec.rules.validate.deny	spec.validations and invert the logic
spec.rules.validate.failureAction	spec.validationActions
spec.rules.validate.failureActionOverrides	not supported; use policy exceptions instead
spec.rules.validate.foreach	spec.validations with CEL comprehensions like all(), exists(), exists_one()
spec.rules.validate.manifests	Not supported
spec.rules.validate.message	spec.validations.message or spec.validations.messageExpression
spec.rules.validate.pattern	spec.validations
spec.rules.validate.podSecurity	Not supported; use spec.validations for each pod security control

ClusterPolicy validate pattern:

validate:
  pattern:
    spec:
      containers:
        - name: '*'
          image: '!*:latest'

ValidatingPolicy:

validations:
  - expression: >
      ['app', 'version'].all(label,
        object.metadata.?labels[label].orValue('') != ''
      )
    message: "Pod must have an 'app' and 'version' labels"

ClusterPolicy validate deny

validate:
  deny:
    conditions:
      all:
        - key: '{{ request.object.spec.replicas }}'
          operator: GreaterThan
          value: 10
  message: 'Replica count cannot exceed 10'

ValidatingPolicy:

Note the logic innversion when converting a deny rule to a CEL expression:

validate:
  cel:
    expressions:
      - expression: 'object.spec.replicas <= 10'
        message: 'Replica count cannot exceed 10'

Refer to the ValidatingPolicy documentation for details and additional examples.

Mutate Rule

ClusterPolicy	CEL-based policies
spec.rules.mutate.foreach	CEL comprehensions e.g., all(), exists(), exists_one()
spec.rules.mutate.mutateExisting	spec.evaluation.mutateExisting.enabled
spec.rules.mutate.patchStrategicMerge	not supported; convert to patchType: ApplyConfiguration or patchType: JSONPatch
spec.rules.mutate.patchesJson6902	patchType: JSONPatch
spec.rules.mutate.targets	spec.matchConstraints or spec.targetMatchConstraints

Refer to the MutatingPolicy documentation for details and examples.

Generate Rule

ClusterPolicy	CEL-based policies
spec.rules.generate.apiVersion	CEL expressions
spec.rules.generate.clone	CEL expressions
spec.rules.generate.cloneList	CEL expressions
spec.rules.generate.data	CEL expressions
spec.rules.generate.foreach	CEL expressions
spec.rules.generate.generateExisting	spec.evaluation.generateExisting
spec.rules.generate.kind	CEL expressions
spec.rules.generate.name	CEL expressions
spec.rules.generate.namespace	CEL expressions
spec.rules.generate.orphanDownstreamOnPolicyDelete	spec.evaluation.orphanDownstreamOnPolicyDelete
spec.rules.generate.synchronize	spec.evaluation.synchronize

A number of the GeneratingPolicy fields, such as the generated resource properties, are now directly handled as CEL expressions. See GeneratingPolicy docs for details.

Verify Images Rule

ClusterPolicy	CEL-based policies
spec.rules.verifyImages.imageReferences	spec.matchImageReferences
spec.rules.verifyImages.skipImageReferences	spec.matchImageReferences with CEL expressions
spec.rules.verifyImages.type	spec.attestors[].cosign or spec.attestors[].notary
spec.rules.verifyImages.attestors	spec.attestors
spec.rules.verifyImages.attestations	spec.attestations and spec.validations
spec.rules.verifyImages.imageRegistryCredentials	spec.credentials
spec.rules.verifyImages.mutateDigest	spec.validationConfigurations.mutateDigest
spec.rules.verifyImages.verifyDigest	spec.validationConfigurations.verifyDigest
spec.rules.verifyImages.required	spec.validationConfigurations.required
spec.rules.imageExtractors	spec.images

Refer to the ImageValidatingPolicy documentation for details and examples.

CleanupPolicy

CleanupPolicy	CEL-based policies
spec.conditions	spec.matchConstraints and spec.matchConditions
spec.context	spec.variables
spec.deletionPropagationPolicy	spec.deletionPropagationPolicy
spec.exclude	spec.matchConstraints.excludeResourceRules
spec.match	spec.matchConstraints and spec.matchConditions
spec.schedule	spec.schedule

Refer to the DeletingPolicy documentation for details and examples.

PolicyException

The legacy kyverno.io PolicyException must be migrated to the policies.kyverno.io PolicyException, which works with the CEL-based policy types:

Legacy PolicyException (kyverno.io)	PolicyException (policies.kyverno.io)
spec.exceptions.policyName	spec.policyRefs.name
spec.exceptions.ruleNames	not applicable; CEL policies do not contain named rules
spec.match	spec.matchConditions
spec.conditions	spec.matchConditions
spec.podSecurity	spec.matchConditions with CEL expressions

apiVersion: policies.kyverno.io/v1
kind: PolicyException
metadata:
  name: allow-team-tool
  namespace: delta
spec:
  policyRefs:
    - name: disallow-host-namespaces
      kind: ValidatingPolicy
  matchConditions:
    - name: match-pod-name
      expression: object.metadata.name.startsWith('important-tool')

Refer to the Policy Exceptions guide for details and examples.

Context Variables

Traditional Kyverno	CEL Equivalent	Description
{{ request.object }}	object	The resource being validated
{{ request.oldObject }}	oldObject	Previous version (for updates)
{{ request.operation }}	request.operation	Operation type (CREATE, UPDATE, DELETE)
{{ serviceAccountName }}	request.userInfo.username	Service account name
{{ request.namespace }}	object.metadata.namespace	Resource namespace

Testing

You can use the Kyverno CLI to validate the policy syntax:

# Test with a sample resource
kyverno apply validating-policy.yaml --resource test-pod.yaml

Alternatively, you can use the Kyverno Playground.

If you have existing Kyverno CLI tests, you can use them with the new policy with no changes, and validate it works as expected.

If you have existing Kyverno Chainsaw tests, any policy type and status checks will need to be converted. The rest of the test logic can be reused.

Detecting Legacy Policy Usage

Starting with Kyverno v1.19, the admission controller and the Kyverno CLI emit deprecation warnings to help you find remaining legacy policies before they are removed.

Admission Warnings

When a legacy kyverno.io policy type is created or updated, the response includes a warning identifying the replacement type:

Warning: kyverno.io/v1 ClusterPolicy is deprecated and will be removed in a future release; migrate to ValidatingPolicy, MutatingPolicy, GeneratingPolicy or ImageValidatingPolicy (policies.kyverno.io), see https://kyverno.io/docs/guides/migration-to-cel/

Warnings are also returned for deprecated field values, such as the lowercase enforce/audit validation failure actions:

Warning: spec.validationFailureAction: Validation failure actions enforce/audit are deprecated, use Enforce/Audit instead.

CLI Warnings

The kyverno apply and kyverno test commands print the same kind-level deprecation warnings when loading legacy policies or policy exceptions (field-level warnings are only emitted by the admission controller). To enforce migration in CI pipelines, add the --warnings-as-errors flag to make these commands fail when any deprecation warning is found:

kyverno apply /path/to/policy.yaml --resource /path/to/resource.yaml --warnings-as-errors
kyverno test . --warnings-as-errors

Tracking Usage with Metrics

The kyverno_deprecated_api_requests_total counter, labeled by group, version, kind, and field, tracks admission requests that use deprecated policy types or fields. Use it to confirm that nothing in the cluster still creates or updates legacy policies before upgrading. See the metrics reference for details and example queries.

Troubleshooting

CEL Expression Errors

Error: unknown field 'foo' Solution: Use has() or ? to check field existence:

expression: "has(object.metadata.labels) && has(object.metadata.labels.foo) && object.metadata.labels.foo == 'value'"

expression: "object.metadata.?labels.foo.orValue('') == 'value'"

Error: index out of bounds Solution: Check array length before accessing:

expression: "size(object.spec.initContainers) > 0 && object.spec.initContainers[0].image != 'bad'"

Error: expression of type 'any' cannot be range of a comprehension (must be list, map, or dynamic) Solution: Convert JSON types to dynamic using orValue

"name": "deploymentList",
"expression": "resource.List('apps/v1', 'deployments', object.metadata.namespace).items.orValue([])"

Additional Resources

• CEL Language Specification
• Kyverno CEL Functions Reference
• ValidatingPolicy API Reference
• Kyverno CLI Testing Guide